Submitted by: Ma. Teresa D. Sarraga
Submitted to: Mr. Jony V. Berjes
In compliance with: Political Science 10.1
Date: April 26, 2010
I drove home last night in a pitiable state. It was near midnight and the highway was nearly deserted. This was a lucky break for me as my eyelids felt like they were being pulled shut by invisible weights. I was so exhausted that I was sure I would fall asleep the moment my head hit the bed. I was wrong. When I turned onto the street where I live, I found that the entrance was blocked by a multitude of cars and people. Rukawa Kaede* decided to make an appearance. A make-shift platform was erected in the vacant lot across the street from my house. Set on that platform were a couple of speakers that blasted cheesy campaign jingles… right into my bedroom. By the time I actually made it into my room, sleep seemed lightyears away.
Understandably, I was a wreck the next day. I was up most of the night listening to someone shout into a microphone. Our family cook, who lives next door from us, told us that it went on till the wee hours of the morning.
“Abi nako Sakuragi Hanamichi* mu diha sa inyo? Bibo man lagi kaayo mu kagabii?” I asked her. Her answer painted a dismal picture of the upcoming 2010 elections. She said, “Sakuragi Hanamichi* bitaw mi, Mai. Nanunga mi didto kagabii incaso manghatag sila ug sobre. Wala man so Hanamichi* gyud mi.”
Cagayan de Oro has fallen into the pattern of what I have dubbed as “blind voting.” Blind voting is originally a term used in IT. Blind voting is when you vote for a website, raising its rank, without taking a look at it first. It is the same in politics. People vote for a candidate for reasons other than that they support his vision, platform and programs. For one, people respond to incentives. It is for this reason that I did not think much of the numbers that turned up on the survey conducted by Kinaadman. The locals are swayed much too easily. Slide a wad of hundreds their way in the morning and by noon time they will be as obedient as trained Labrador Retrievers. The survey does not reflect votes for candidates based on virtues or platforms. It reflects the depth of these candidates’ pockets. And though this may not hold true for all candidates, it is a reality and it is enough to plant the seed of doubt in my mind.
Furthermore, Kagay-anons, like many other Filipinos, suffer from ignorance. When I was eighteen years old I was blissfully ignorant of the workings of politics. Yes, I was an idealist. I wanted the cost of living in the city to go down. I wanted to see someone put an end to corruption. I wanted more job opportunities to be available to those who belong to the masses. In the end, I was simply naive. I wanted all these things but I did not know who would make them possible. As the survey shows, there are many others who are going through the same thing.
I am now twenty-one years old. I am older and arguably wiser. I am passionate and extremely opinionated. I think well of few candidates and even help campaign for others. But as it stands, my passion and opinions will do none of them any good. My voice will not be heard. The survey did nothing to sway my vote as I will not be voting in the coming election. I am not a registered voter.
















